差别

这里会显示出您选择的修订版和当前版本之间的差别。

--- digital_markets_act [2025/07/19 02:09] – created xiaoer
+++ digital_markets_act [未知日期] (当前版本) – 移除 - 外部编辑 (未知日期) 127.0.0.1
@@ 行 1: / 行 1: @@
-======Digital Markets Act (DMA)======
-The Digital Markets Act (DMA) is a landmark piece of legislation from the [[European Union]] designed to make the digital economy fairer and more competitive. It specifically targets the immense power of the largest online platforms, which the EU has dubbed 'gatekeepers'. Think of it as a new rulebook for the digital playground, ensuring the biggest kids don't get to make all the rules and bully the smaller ones. For years, a handful of tech giants have dominated the digital space, acting as essential gateways between businesses and consumers. The DMA aims to dismantle unfair advantages these gatekeepers have built, forcing them to open up their ecosystems and compete on a more level playing field. It works in tandem with its sibling legislation, the [[Digital Services Act (DSA)]], which focuses more on content moderation and illegal goods, services, and content online. While the DSA cleans up //what// is on the platforms, the DMA re-engineers //how// the platforms operate.
-===== What's the Big Idea Behind the DMA? =====
-Imagine a bustling digital marketplace, like a giant online shopping mall. For years, a few huge companies have not only owned the mall but also all the best storefronts, the advertising billboards, and even the roads leading to it. They could direct all the shoppers to their own stores, charge other shops exorbitant rent, and basically write the rules as they went along. This concentration of power stifles innovation and limits consumer choice.
-The DMA is the EU's bold attempt to introduce a new referee to this digital mall. Its core mission is to promote **contestability** and **fairness**. It's not about punishing success but about preventing the most powerful platforms from using their dominance in one area to crush competition in another. This proactive approach is a shift from traditional [[antitrust]] law, which typically reacts to anti-competitive behaviour //after// it has already occurred and caused harm. The DMA, by contrast, sets out a clear list of 'dos and don'ts' for gatekeepers in advance, aiming to prevent the harm from happening in the first place.
-===== Who Are the 'Gatekeepers'? =====
-The DMA doesn't apply to every tech company. It exclusively targets companies that meet a specific, high-threshold set of criteria, designating them as 'gatekeepers'. A company is likely a gatekeeper if it:
-  * Has a significant impact on the EU's internal market (e.g., annual turnover of at least €7.5 billion within the EU).
-  * Operates a 'core platform service' that serves as an important gateway for business users to reach end-users (e.g., search engines, app stores, social networks).
-  * Enjoys an entrenched and durable position in the market (e.g., at least 45 million monthly active users in the EU and 10,000 yearly active business users).
-As of the initial designations, the European Commission has named the following companies and some of their core services as gatekeepers:
-  * [[Alphabet]] (Google Search, YouTube, Android, Chrome, Google Ads)
-  * [[Amazon]] (Marketplace, Amazon Ads)
-  * [[Apple]] (App Store, iOS, Safari)
-  * [[ByteDance]] (TikTok)
-  * [[Meta]] (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, Marketplace)
-  * [[Microsoft]] (Windows, LinkedIn)
-===== Key Obligations for Gatekeepers =====
-The DMA imposes a list of obligations on these designated gatekeepers. Failure to comply can result in hefty fines of up to 10% of the company's total worldwide annual turnover.
-==== A Few Key "Don'ts" ====
-  * **No Self-Preferencing:** Gatekeepers cannot rank their own products or services more favourably than those of third parties. For example, Google Search cannot automatically place Google Flights or Google Shopping at the very top of relevant search results.
-  * **No Tying or Bundling:** Users must not be forced to use one core service (like an identity service or a web browser) to access another.
-  * **No Blocking Uninstalls:** Gatekeepers cannot prevent users from uninstalling pre-installed software or apps on their operating systems.
-==== A Few Key "Dos" ====
-  * **Allow Third-Party App Stores:** Gatekeepers must allow users to install apps from third-party app stores and sideload apps from the internet (a major change for Apple's iOS).
-  * **Provide Data Access:** Business users (e.g., sellers on Amazon) must be given access to the data they generate on the gatekeeper's platform.
-  * **Ensure Interoperability:** Certain services, like messaging apps (e.g., WhatsApp and Messenger), must be made to work with smaller competing messaging services upon request.
-===== What Does This Mean for Investors? =====
-For a [[value investing]] practitioner, the DMA is a significant regulatory development that must be factored into any analysis of the tech sector. It's not just a European issue; its principles could inspire similar regulations globally and will fundamentally alter the business models of some of the world's largest companies.
-=== Impact on Gatekeepers ===
-The DMA directly attacks the [[economic moat]] of these tech behemoths. A moat is a company's sustainable competitive advantage, and for many gatekeepers, this moat was built on powerful network effects and closed ecosystems.
-  * **Revenue at Risk:** Practices like self-preferencing and app store commissions are significant [[revenue stream]]s. Forcing Apple to allow alternative payment systems in its App Store or compelling Amazon to stop using third-party seller data to launch its own competing products could directly impact their [[profit margin]]s.
-  * **Weakened Moats:** The mandatory interoperability and the end of closed ecosystems (like Apple's 'walled garden') could erode the stickiness that keeps users locked in. This could lead to a slow decline in [[market share]] over the long term.
-An investor must now ask: //How resilient is this gatekeeper's business model? Can the company innovate and adapt to thrive under these new rules, or is its valuation propped up by anti-competitive practices that are now illegal?//
-=== Opportunities for Competitors ===
-On the flip side, the DMA could be a massive tailwind for smaller, more innovative companies.
-  * **A More Level Playing Field:** A small search engine, a new social media app, or an independent app developer now has a fairer shot at competing for users and customers. The DMA effectively lowers the barriers to entry that the gatekeepers erected.
-  * **New Investment Horizons:** Investors should be on the lookout for agile competitors that can take advantage of this new regulatory landscape. A company that offers a better product could now gain traction more easily without being crushed or bought out by a gatekeeper.
-For the value investor, the core task remains the same: to calculate a company's [[intrinsic value]]. The DMA is a powerful new variable in that calculation. It challenges the long-term durability of the gatekeepers' cash flows while simultaneously creating potential for immense value creation among their would-be rivals.